The Hidden Impact of Deregulation on Carpenter Technology's Bottom Line
Most analysts completely missed the story unfolding in specialty materials manufacturing. Sure, everyone talks about deregulation's impact on banks and energy companies, but I've been tracking Carpenter Technology since the 2018 regulatory shifts, and what I've found is both significant and telling.
The financial transformation at Carpenter tells a story that goes well beyond simple compliance cost savings. Operating income swung from negative $21 million in 2022 to $340 million by 2024. The effective tax rate dropped from a staggering 75.4% in 2020 to just 11.9% in 2024. These aren't just numbers - they're signals of a fundamental shift in how this company operates.
Here's what makes this particularly interesting: the benefits aren't distributed evenly across Carpenter's business segments. The Specialty Alloys Operations division has seen thirteen consecutive quarters of margin improvement, while the Performance Engineered Products segment has remained more stable. This creates a complex picture that most investors aren't seeing.
The numbers tell the real story, but you have to know where to look. Cash from operations jumped from $6 million in 2022 to $275 million in 2024. Return on Equity improved from -0.64% to 12.33% in just two years. If you're wondering how policy changes create winners and losers in ways that aren't immediately obvious, Carpenter Technology provides a compelling case study.
What we're looking at here isn't just one company's financial turnaround. It's a window into how regulatory shifts ripple through entire industries, creating opportunities for companies positioned to capitalize on the changes.
How Deregulation Shaped The Playing Field For Carpenter Technology
Image Source:
https://pixabay.com/
The 2018 regulatory pivot created a fundamentally different operating environment for specialty materials manufacturers. What happened next at Carpenter Technology provides a textbook example of how companies can capitalize on policy shifts - if they position themselves correctly.
Regulatory Oversight Gets A Makeover
The post-2018 landscape looked nothing like what came before. For Carpenter, this wasn't just about fewer forms to fill out or lighter oversight - it represented a complete rethinking of how the business could operate.
If you're wondering what this looks like in practice, consider how quickly the company's financial profile changed. The transformation didn't happen overnight, but when it did occur, the magnitude was striking. Management suddenly had flexibility to pursue strategies that were previously off-limits or prohibitively expensive to implement.
Where The Real Money Gets Made
Here's where it gets interesting - the compliance cost story is only part of the equation. Before deregulation, Carpenter was spending significant resources on administrative overhead that added little value to the actual business. Those costs weren't just line items on an income statement; they were constraining the company's ability to compete effectively.
The streamlined reporting requirements freed up both capital and management attention. Cash from operations tells this story better than anything else - the jump from minimal levels to substantial positive flows reflects how quickly freed-up resources can translate into operational improvements. This isn't just about cutting costs; it's about reallocating resources to activities that actually drive growth.
The Competitive Dynamics Shift
Perhaps the most intriguing aspect of this story is how deregulation changed the competitive playing field. Carpenter didn't just benefit from lower costs - they gained strategic advantages that some competitors couldn't match as effectively.
The Specialty Alloys Operations segment became the star performer here, achieving that remarkable streak of thirteen consecutive quarters of margin improvement. Operating margins expanding from 21.4% to 29.1% doesn't happen by accident. It suggests the company found ways to focus capacity on complex, higher-value products that command premium pricing.
This gets to the heart of how policy changes create winners and losers. Companies that can quickly adapt their strategies to take advantage of new flexibility tend to pull ahead of those that stick to old playbooks. Carpenter's management team clearly recognized the opportunity and acted on it. The $400 million share repurchase program and raised guidance to $520-527 million in operating income for FY25 signal they believe this competitive advantage is sustainable.
The key insight here is that regulatory changes don't just reduce costs - they can fundamentally alter competitive dynamics in ways that create lasting advantages for well-positioned companies.
Financial Signals: What The Numbers Reveal
The transformation becomes clearer when you break down the performance metrics. Revenue climbed from $1,836 million in 2022 to $2,760 million by 2024 - that's a 50% jump in just two years. But here's what's more interesting: the earnings swing tells a different story than simple top-line growth.
From a negative EPS of -$1.01 in 2022 to a normalized $4.74 per share in 2024. That's not just recovery - that's a complete reversal of fortune. The quarterly results back this up. FY25 Q3 delivered an adjusted EPS of $1.88, beating analyst estimates by 8.4%. More telling is the consistency: Carpenter has delivered positive earnings surprises in 10 of the last 12 quarters, with recent surprises averaging 8-9% above consensus.
If you're wondering whether this momentum can sustain itself, the margin story provides some answers. The FQ2 2025 gross margin hit 26.2% - a substantial 698 basis points improvement year-over-year. The Specialty Alloys Operations segment achieved an even more impressive operating margin of 29.1% in Q3 FY25, up from 21.4% in the same quarter last year. These aren't just good numbers - they're exceptional by industry standards.
Analysts are projecting continued expansion, with adjusted EBITDA margins expected to grow approximately 350 basis points in FY25 alone. That kind of projection suggests the market believes something fundamental has changed about how this company operates.
The cash flow story might be the most compelling piece of the puzzle. Free cash flow per share reversed from -$1.39 in 2023 to a positive $3.59 in 2024. Adjusted free cash flow is expected to more than double in FY25 compared to the $142 million generated in FY24. Yet capital expenditures have remained disciplined - $97 million in 2024 versus $91 million in 2022.
This enhanced cash position enabled the $400 million share repurchase program announced earlier this year. When management authorizes buybacks of that magnitude, it's usually because they see their stock as undervalued relative to future earning power. The question is whether they're right.
Where The Real Story Lives: SAO vs. PEP Performance
The segment-level breakdown reveals exactly why Carpenter's transformation isn't a simple deregulation success story. You've got two very different businesses responding to the same regulatory environment in completely different ways.
SAO's Margin Expansion Machine
The Specialty Alloys Operations segment has been the clear beneficiary of regulatory changes. Those thirteen consecutive quarters of margin improvement I mentioned earlier? That's all SAO. Operating margins jumped from 21.4% to 29.1% year-over-year, with operating income surging 82% to $137.8 million in Q3 FY25.
What makes this particularly interesting is the acceleration pattern. SAO's adjusted operating margin hit 25.2% in FQ4 FY24, representing both sequential improvement (up 380 basis points quarter-over-quarter) and substantial annual gains (up 840 basis points year-over-year). This isn't just steady progress - it's accelerating operational efficiency.
PEP's Steady-As-She-Goes Approach
The Performance Engineered Products segment tells a different story entirely. While SAO has been posting record margins, PEP's operating income has remained relatively stable compared to the previous year. It's not a bad outcome, but it's certainly not the dramatic transformation we're seeing elsewhere in the company.
This stability might actually be valuable in a portfolio context, but it raises questions about whether PEP will eventually catch up to SAO's performance or if this represents a fundamental difference in how deregulation impacts different product categories.
The Strategic Shift That Changes Everything
Here's where it gets really interesting. Carpenter has been deliberately limiting its order intake despite backlogs running at three times pre-Covid levels. That might sound counterintuitive, but it's actually a brilliant strategic move enabled by the regulatory environment.
This selective approach allows the company to focus available capacity on complex, higher-value products - exactly the kind of strategic flexibility that regulatory burden used to prevent. It's a perfect example of how policy changes create opportunities that go well beyond simple cost savings.
The margin expansion we're seeing, particularly in SAO, reflects this shift toward higher-value work. When you can be more selective about which orders you take, you can optimize for profitability rather than just volume.
Management's Bet On The Future
When a company authorizes a $400 million share buyback program, that tells you something about management's confidence. Carpenter's board made this move in April 2025, and it represents one of the clearest votes of confidence I've seen in the post-deregulation environment.
Here's what makes this particularly telling: they could burn through that entire buyback in just two years given their current free cash flow outlook. They started modest - $8.2 million in repurchases during Q2 FY25 - but the pace is expected to ramp up significantly. Meanwhile, they've kept the dividend steady at $0.20 quarterly, with a conservative payout ratio that dropped from 69.86% in 2023 to just 21.45% in 2024. That leaves plenty of room for future increases.
What The Market Is Saying
Analyst target prices have climbed from $155 in July 2024 to $240 by May 2025. That's not just optimism - it reflects expanding valuation multiples as analysts apply a 16.0x EV/EBITDA multiple versus Carpenter's three-year average of around 10.1x.
The interesting thing is that even at these elevated multiples, Carpenter still trades at a 21% discount to peer average forward EV/EBITDA of 19.6x. Either the market hasn't fully recognized the transformation, or there's still skepticism about sustainability.
The Guidance Story
Management raised FY25 operating income guidance to $520-527 million and set ambitious targets of $765-800 million by FY27. Those aren't modest adjustments - they're statements about where this business is heading.
Wall Street seems to believe them. Analyst confidence has grown substantially, with 57% issuing "Buy" recommendations and none recommending "Sell." The consensus forecasts 24.46% EPS growth from $7.32 in FY25 to $9.11 in FY26. At the same time, the net leverage ratio is expected to fall to 0.8x in FY25 despite the robust buyback program.
That combination - aggressive capital returns, ambitious guidance, and improving balance sheet metrics - suggests management sees this transformation as sustainable rather than cyclical. Whether they're right remains the key question for investors.
The Bottom Line
Carpenter Technology's transformation since 2018 tells us something important about how policy changes actually work in practice. This isn't just another deregulation success story - it's a window into the mechanics of regulatory impact that most investors miss.
What strikes me most about this analysis is the uneven nature of the benefits. The SAO segment captured nearly all of the margin expansion while PEP remained stable. That kind of disparity doesn't happen by accident. It reflects how deregulation creates strategic choices that weren't available before, allowing management to focus resources on higher-value opportunities.
The $400 million share buyback program tells us where management thinks this story is heading. When a company authorizes repurchases of that magnitude after years of struggling cash flow, it's making a statement about future earnings power. I think they're probably right to be confident, given the operational momentum we're seeing.
But here's the broader lesson that applies beyond Carpenter: regulatory shifts don't create uniform winners. They create opportunities for companies that can recognize and capitalize on the changes quickly. The companies that figure out how to reallocate resources toward higher-margin activities tend to emerge as the real beneficiaries.
For investors, this means looking past the headline effects of policy changes to understand which specific business models and segments are positioned to benefit most. It's not enough to know that deregulation helps an industry - you need to understand which parts of that industry capture the value.
Carpenter's story isn't finished. The margin expansion trends suggest there's more upside if they can maintain their operational momentum. That's a big if, but the financial flexibility they've built gives them room to navigate whatever comes next.
The Free Markets Report is provided by Lead-Lag Publishing, LLC. All opinions and views mentioned in this report constitute our judgments as of the date of writing and are subject to change at any time. Information within this material is not intended to be used as a primary basis for investment decisions, and should also not be construed as advice meeting the particular investment needs of any individual investor. Trading signals produced by The Free Markets Report are independent of other services provided by Lead-Lag Publishing, LLC, or its affiliates, and the positioning of accounts under their management may differ. Please remember that investing involves risk, including loss of principal, and past performance may not be indicative of future results. Lead-Lag Publishing, LLC, its members, officers, directors, and employees expressly disclaim all liability with respect to actions taken based on any or all of the information in this writing.